« Apple iPad: Toy or Listening Tool? | Main | Radio Needs to Sprout Wings »

August 30, 2011

Comments

Wm_Tucker

Innovation -- technological and otherwise -- rarely comes from established industry. Thanks to deregulation, broadcast radio has become particularly non-competitive. When a broadcaster can control 6-7 stations in a given market knowing radio's ubiquitous use by the public, there's very little incentive to change.

Technological development is also cost prohibitive. Again, most companies -- regardless of industry -- aren't inclined to invest significant sums of money in cultivating new technologies ahead of evidence a market exists for the product/service. While both satrad and net radio are exciting technologies, neither have demonstrated a strong economic justification for large-scale investment by the broadcasters.

I agree, however, that the terrestrial radio industry suffers from a considerable lack of creative thinking by its executives.

Beau Rafferty

Ron, I think it goes back to the old adage; "It's Not What You Have That Counts. It's What You Do With It." I've worked at stations that were literally "A Toilet, Without One!"

Peripheral Markets with facilities put together with Duct Tape, Heath-Kit, and Radio Shack. Who beat back some of the country's Biggest, Legendary Stations of the day, and dominated some of their ADI's.

And, I have also worked gleaming "Fishbowls", that couldn't even find their way to Mediocrity.

Playing with the latest toys, is fun! Orchestrating a Studio in ways that leave the Engineers baffled & bewildered, is a trip !!! :o)

Beau Rafferty

Rich, I agree about the Asymmetrical Music Sourcing. Reminds me alot of the old "Regional Flavoring" that seems to be lacking, today.

Mr. Nuthin... To me, you just hit the Antithetical Button, right on the head! I think the problem is, that most of the audiences have realized that they aren't the customer. They are the Product, and they are looking for respect, elsewhere.

Richard Harker

Beau, yes, creative radio people have always experimented with eclectic music mixes. It still continues today.

The reason a radio person didn't invent Pandora is that radio people continue to think of radio as a linear sequential delivery system--just like your Harris system.

Even today the majority of pure-play Internet radio stations just emulate radio's linear sequential delivery systems.

We remain skeptical of the "music genome's" efficacy. Pandora's contribution is showing the potential of a non-linear delivery system.

Cole

Nice, thought-provoking article; one which should serve as a lesson and catalyst for not letting this happen again.

Perhaps it's not quite fair to blame our industry for not inventing Pandora. A lot of times, creative destruction comes about from folks not associated with the industry in which they change. Look at Reed Hastings from Netflix. Or Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, which wiped out the encyclopedia business. Blame however, can be placed on our industry for not reacting. Steve jobs didn't invent the mp3 player. He just made it better. Radio could have ... actually still can ... make the Pandora idea better.

But the industry has to change. This isn’t easy. Reinventing yourself requires letting go of what it is you identify as core to what you do today. Not easy in the best of times. Particularly difficult in not-so-good times. I feel there are several areas of change in which radio must embrace to not only prevent another Pandora scenario from happening, but to get back in front as innovators.

Creating vs operating. Radio needs to get away from the just get by environment from which they are operating today. Just getting by is no longer going to cut it. Radio needs structural shift. Re-think everything. If a process can be performed in a more cost efficient or streamlined manner, dump it. It’s not a core competency.  Why waste a further thought on it? Re-invest those gains back into the company. This needs to be done now because while you’re standing still your competitors, even those you don’t yet know about, are improving. Some are completely redefining our entire industry.

Invest more in our youth. They have great ideas. Tim Westergren was 34 when he created Pandora. Mark Zuckerberg was 20. Bill Gates was 19. Greater Media's Peter Smyth wrote an excellent article ( http://www.greatermedia.com/?p=1188 ) on this topic entitled 'New ideas need new blood'.

Seek out agents of change and take some calculated risks. The new ideas & new blood people are out there. Radio needs to do a better job at finding them and stepping out of their comfort zone. You might fail at first. You might fail period. But isn't it better to burn out than fade away? No pain .... no gain.

Richard Harker

>You're asking why the radio industry didn't invent a service you've spent the last six months trashing?<

Bob, we've written extensively about the company, much of it critically, but we've also pointed out the things they've done well.

In this post we're discussing personalization, not the company nor its actions. Don't confuse the company with the product.

The company has played loose with the facts repeatedly. The company has seemed obsessed with knocking radio rather than letting the product stand on its own.

In writing about the absence of any first-mover advantage, we've suggested that radio watch the marketplace, identify opportunities, and then exploit them.

This post is consistent with that message.

We've also praised Pandora's user marketing, which is far more positive than their message to the press.

Iknow Nuthin

There are many people in radio who have brilliant ideas about a multitude of things to serve the listener.

That is where the ideas inside the companies stop.

The execs for all the companies have said, and we have heard them say,
"Radio's most important function is to serve the advertiser."

Sometimes when people come up with really good ideas, the inspiration doesn't spark from the root thought of "How do we monetize this?".

When there isn't a budget for billboards, television commercials, concert tickets, t-shirts, or a LIVE Jock, why in the world would there be a budget for R&D on ventures whose profit margins may not even exist?

Bob Dobalina

You're asking why the radio industry didn't invent a service you've spent the last six months trashing? As I understood it from reading this blog, Pandora is hype, "WKRP," and any concern about it overblown.

Here's a question: Why didn't RADIO CONSULTANTS invent it?

Ron Roberts

In essence, radio has always neglected to be forward-thinking with regards to online listening. It's an after-thought in almost every building of every radio station not in the top-tier markets. Since the Telecom act, radio owners have stopped investing in their product and working to improve upon it, and have instead worked to (in their minds) "trim the fat" and out-sell their competitors with lower spot rates. There's been no re-investing in radio stations. Walk into your typical Cumulus or Citadel cluster building and check out the equipment they're running off of. I was in a top 75 market Citadel cluster three years ago, and they're still running on original Scott Studios software. Original. Circa mid-1990s. Cumulus? Please; bailing wire and duct tape are key "tools" in an engineer's toolbox. If radio were truly looking to remain relevant, they'd embrace what MTV's left by the wayside - music videos. I can walk into any nightclub now and witness a VJ spin from one song to another, complete with a video, and yet radio won't invest in upgrades to be able to do the same (which would drive traffic to their sites and give a visual presence to their stream, plus give them programming that would/could land them on a local cable channel, as well).

Beau Rafferty

We did! (sort of...)

I've known scores of Jocks, Programmers, but primarily Music, and Production Directors from all over the country who have had a tremendous Library of what now, is commonly known as "Mix-Tapes". 7"-10" Reels & cassettes filling shelf after shelf.

We just played with Gates/Harris 9000 systems, Profit, Scott Studios, and Oakwood-Media Touch. Selector, Music Master, "Format 51", Now... ???

I always got a kick out of the people who used to hear one of my tapes and demand to know what station it was, and why none of the "Locals" were playing most of it. Stuff they been wanting to hear for years!

We've always have been the Proto-Pandora, for decades! The only difference? The audience can now, finally get the music THEY really want. Not what they're spoon-fed by vested interests.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About Radio Insights

  • email us at info@harkerresearch.com
  • Radio Insights is a service of Harker Research, a leading U.S. media research and consulting company. Harker Research provides innovative and insightful strategic research to help our clients grow.

    With nearly thirty years of experience, we’ve helped hundreds of radio stations create innovative solutions to the challenges they’ve faced. Today radio faces a myriad of new challenges. Harker Research is helping our clients prepare for this new world.

    We believe that 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions, solutions created through our custom action-oriented strategic research. And while radio faces many new challenges, radio also faces many new opportunities that can potentially transform the medium. Our broad range of proprietary research tools are each tailored to help radio stations capitalize on these new opportunities.

    Our experience, skills, and tools can help stations rejuvenate old formats or develop new formats. We can help create and strengthen a brand’s positioning. Our research can create tools to develop and enhance the full brand experience across multiple media and vehicles, from traditional mass media to web and wireless strategies. As radio moves towards electronic measurement, Harker Research is helping our clients to compete in this new arena.

    Radio Insights explores the many turbulent forces swirling around radio. It offers our take on the issues of the day and demonstrates the company’s original thinking. If you would like to talk with us directly about any of the issues we touch on, call us at (919) 954-8300.