Neilsen: Young Adults Do Listen to Radio is the headline of a recent Advertising Age article. Nielsen found high levels of listenership including among young listeners. Readers of this blog won't find this surprising. There is a large body of research that shows that despite streaming, iPods, and the like listeners of all ages continue to use radio in large numbers.
As reported by Ad Age:
Results from the leading media-measurement company's first U.S. pilot study of radio listening, in Lexington, Ky., indicate a potential reversal of a trend that has been working against radio for the past decade: a supposed decline in radio listening among adults 18 to 34.
People in homes that use cellphones as their sole source of phone communication made up more than 20% of Nielsen's sample and skewed toward 18- to 34-year-olds, significantly younger than landline-only homes.
Nielsen found that cellphone-only homes listened to radio an average 23 hours per week, while the total sample spent just more than 19 hours listening to radio. Those younger households also tuned in to an average of 3.5 stations vs. less than three for landline homes.
In total, Nielsen found that radio reached 93% of people in the market over the age of 12, 90% of people who do not read newspapers, 96% of light or non-broadcast TV viewers and 96% of those who go to the movies.
New media pundits have been pointing to declining listenership as reported by Arbitron as proof that radio is in a deep irreversible decline. We argued here, however, that methodological changes may be behind the apparent declines.
One problem we noted was Arbitron's apparent inability to reach a rapidly growing segment of Americans, cellphone-only households.
Responding to pressure from broadcasters, Arbitron laid out a plan of gradually adding cellphone-only households over several years. Nielsen's announcement that they would include cellphone-only households forced Arbitron to accelerate their transition, but they still under-sample cellphone households.
Nielsen is also using a address-based recruiting system compared to Arbitron's telephone number based system. Nielsen points out that with their approach they are able to identify 98% of the households in a market, versus Arbitron's 66%.
Recall that Arbitron uses address based recruitment in Houston, but refuses to do so in other markets.
Nielsen's finding that 20% of listeners live in cellphone-only households and that these people spend 20% more time with radio is significant.
If this holds in other Nielsen markets, it would essentially prove our point that the apparent decline is a product of Arbitron's increasingly antiquated recruitment, and has nothing to do with a real decline in listenership.
Nielsen has shown that despite YouTube, Hulu, and all the other on-line sources of video entertainment, televison viewing is increasing, not decreasing. Why would we think it would be different with radio?
Unfortunately, in the PR war between radio and the new media, we haven't done a very good job of telling our story. The new media pundits have declared radio dead so many times that many even in our industry are beginning to believe it.
Radio as a united voice has to declare the "radio is dead" propaganda a lie if we want our listeners and customers to believe it too.
Posted by: Richard | March 09, 2009 at 04:56 PM
This research comes as no surprise to me.
What I don't understand is the blind spot marketer's have with Local Radio. This medium is remarkably connective to mobile, digital and people.
And, still many marketers find self-defeating/tired ways to say "NO to Radio."
Ironically, it is they that are missing out on unprecedented opportunity.
I have proof. I know of an Auto Dealer,in our market, that for the past 7 years has used 98% Radio in his marketing mix. He targets 21-45 adults. This February 2009 was his second best February in the past 7 years. He is winning in the recession. If you ask him how he dominated our market he will say "I dominate Radio. I dominate market share."
Numbers don't lie. The closest dealer to him was significantly behind in car sales and they use a more diverse marketing mix.
The question is not whether Local Radio connects with target audiences. The questions is " Are marketer's willing see Local Radio's new opportunity and learn how to use it with mobile/digital to gain mind blowing results?
The time has come for marketer's to revisit their biases around Radio. I know the folks that do, that see the HUGE opportunity will surely win in the new land scape of the consumer-driven marketplace.
Posted by: Melissa Kunde | March 09, 2009 at 04:32 PM