Are you more likely to hit the bull’s eye throwing one dart or a thousand?
A thousand, of course. The more times you try something, the more likely you’ll succeed.
You’d think it would be the case with ratings success, but it's not always true.
Harker Research looked at winner’s in Arbitron’s PPM markets and found that companies that own a lot of stations do win often, but not as often as you might expect.
Clear Channel is the largest radio group with over two hundred stations in PPM measured markets.
CBS, the second largest group in PPM markets, has half as many stations as Clear Channel. Cumulus is the third largest group with less than a third of Clear Channel’s count.
What impact does this size difference have on the number of each group’s successes?
Clear Channel has a total of 47 stations that rank first, second, or third--more than any other company.
CBS has 18, while Cumulus has only 5.
The graph at left illustrates this. It shows the number of stations ranked first, second, or third in PPM markets for eleven groups who compete in at least two PPM markets and have at least one winner.
If stations were radio darts, we would expect Clear Channel to have more winners than any other group because they have more stations. However, as it turns out, the dart analogy isn’t completely accurate for radio.
While size does matter, a few smaller groups outperform their larger competitors.
The second graph below shows how well the groups perform when we take into account the size of each group. It shows the number of winners expressed as a percentage of stations each company has in PPM markets.
Note that Clear Channel falls from first in absolute terms to third when we take into account the size of the group.
CBS falls even further, ending up 6th. Cumulus, though third in the number of stations in PPM markets, ranks sixth in absolute terms, and falls to dead last in its percentage of winners.
The two stand-out groups are Hubbard and Cox. Each group is considerably smaller than Clear Channel, CBS, or Cumulus, yet each has a better “hit rate” than their larger competitors.
Four smaller groups out-perform CBS, and eight smaller groups out-perform Cumulus.
The success of these smaller groups competing against much larger groups suggests that when it comes to local radio, smaller groups may have an under-appreciated advantage–-a topic that we’ll explore in a follow-up post.
Note: The analysis is based on the June 2012 full week total person results in 44 PPM markets using Arbitron’s publicly released data. We’ve excluded embedded markets and those with substantial out-of-market listening. Station counts are based on number of in-market stations only.
Dave, can you post the link to his stream so that I can check his station out?
Posted by: Innocent Bystander | July 25, 2012 at 01:03 PM
You would THINK that a larger radio group would have the resources to capitalize on it's ability to research, create and market a great product. We can see here that the big guys don't have that ability. Two words. Jerry Lee. Owner, operator, financier, marketer, success.
Posted by: Dave Mason | July 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM
This is based purely on one month total 6+ number and doesn’t reflect target demo, power ratios, seasonal trends, or revenues. It assumes the companies’ goal is only ratings, not revenue.
CBS and Cumulus have a number of talk stations that frequently produce power ratios twice to three times the average station.
Cox is selling off their markets in bulk. How much do they value their rating success?
A fairer way to provide the revenues generated by the ratings conversions. Being the third ranked station is not as valuable if the other two are beating you in the format and demo.
I hate when this stuff gets published…..
Posted by: Innocent Bystander | July 25, 2012 at 11:25 AM